Thoughts on the G3 iPod Nano
in my earlier post, I said I hadn't tried out the iPod Nano yet. Well now I have, and have some thoughts. As usual, I'm going to say this is my opinion and you should take it as such. I also am going to not get into any big flame wars on this - if you disagree, please post respectfully.
I think they made a strange tradeoff. I think that for most people, the Nano has always been about music. If you were one of the (few) users who really cared about video, you obviously went elsewhere. Now, they've added video to the device. This is a nice adder, but IMHO not all that compelling given the (still) small screen size. But fine, it's got video.
The tradeoff is in designing the device around this scenario. The "fatty" formfactor feels like a worse music device than the G2 iPod Nano in several ways:
- the scrollwheel is really small. to fit it into the little space beneath the screen, it shrank. this makes is quite a bit easier to miss the active surface while "wheeling".
- It is less of a one-handed device. I could hold the tallboy Nano and use my thumb. this one really wants one hand holding it while the other one scrolls. This is hard to describe, so go try one and see.
Don't get me wrong - it's a beautiful little device. But I think (hope?) there's an opening for us. The Zune 4 and 8 are the more music-focused formfactor, but still enable video in landscape mode by turning the device.
Remember when apple end-of-lifed the ipod mini, there was a groundswell of folks who missed it? It didn't matter because there was no reasonable alternative. I'd like to think this time there is one.



5 Comments:
Just a suggestion...
You could always output that video to a TV in full DVD quality (480p) if you wanted.
You're more or less accurate, though (having tried the nano) I believe it's easier to use one-handed for some people.
Zune 4/8 is a definite alternative to the nano now, but I wonder if it'll really stand out. There are quite a few tall-screen, video-capable flash players by this point; even Wi-Fi can only do so much now that the SanDisk Sansa Connect has been out for awhile.
While I think you guys are obviously going after the flash market to get some more people in the social - I think that Apple goofed up more with the iPod Classic. I have one with me, and I have to say, I'd much rather be using my old iPod G5.
They really didn't innovate much, same screen, no wireless, less sophisticated looking rough metal design, and a ui that's slow/unresponsive...oh, and coverflow which lags...
I'd love to see your take on the iPod classic and how it stands up to the new Zune 80.
-Charlie
If we take into consideration that the Zune 2 is going to be presented as an alternative to iPod, the marketing is going to play a big role. If we assume that the new device and the market place have good user experience, it will be interesting to see the marketing effort. Any news of when we can get a peek into marketing effort?
@Charlie
"and a ui that's slow /unresponsive...oh, and coverflow which lags..."
Even after the 10/5/07 iPod firmware update? I noticed an overall improvement in all that. Of course, depending on how many albums covers you have, they do have to load from disk. But it's the same on a PC or Mac.
Post a Comment
<< Home